A layout is not evidence
Position, line thickness and color are interface choices. They should communicate a documented meaning rather than imply that a relationship is proven.
Learn how to build a blockchain fund flow graph that distinguishes observed records from hypotheses, with an interactive illustrative evidence workspace.

A graph should make the evidence easier to inspect. Define what a node represents, define what an edge means, and keep a supporting source for every meaningful connection. The interactive graph on this site uses a fictional training dataset rather than real transactions.
Completing this checklist tracks your own review; it does not validate a transaction or identify an owner. Keep source URLs and retrieval times with your observations. The methodology and coverage disclosure explain the boundaries.
0 of 6 research checks complete
Position, line thickness and color are interface choices. They should communicate a documented meaning rather than imply that a relationship is proven.
Keep unsupported links visible as unresolved items. A small graph with clear references is more useful than a large network of unrecorded assumptions.
The conclusion should remain understandable when the graph is hidden. Use the transaction table to inspect references, units and the selected scope.
| Reference | Network | Path | Amount | Evidence |
|---|

Build a reproducible blockchain forensic search process with scoped questions, source records, explicit assumptions, and reviewable evidence notes.

Compare stablecoin records across networks without assuming a bridge connection. Preserve token identity, protocol evidence, timing, and limits.

Understand what cryptocurrency forensic search engines can support, where attribution becomes inference, and how to evaluate evidence quality.
Start with a public identifier. Check the network. Follow only the relationships your evidence supports.