Forensic research tools

Wallet Analyzer

Organize a public-address history review with network, date-range, token-identity and source-coverage checks. No wallet connection required.

Wallet Research: Get The Full Context — neon blocks and forensic research symbols
Guided research / not automated verification

Public-address research, without identity guesswork.

A useful wallet analysis starts by defining the object under review: one address, a supplied set of addresses, or a particular token account. This tool is a guided research checklist and explorer handoff, not an automated balance index or person-identification service.

Completing this checklist tracks your own review; it does not validate a transaction or identify an owner. Keep source URLs and retrieval times with your observations. The methodology and coverage disclosure explain the boundaries.

0 of 6 research checks complete

01

One address is not a whole identity

A public identifier can anchor a research question without establishing a person’s complete wallet or financial history. Keep the supplied scope visible and do not invent ownership to fill a table.

02

History depends on the selected view

Record pagination, date filters and asset filters. “Visible in the selected interval” is a more useful coverage statement than “all transactions” when completeness has not been established.

03

Exported rows still need interpretation

Keep original values and units. Deduplicate using a rule appropriate to transactions, events or outputs, and preserve the transformation separately from the source material.

Ready to inspect a source?

Begin with the
complete identifier.

The lookup prepares explicit external explorer links. A format match is not proof of existence or activity. Keep the network and source context visible when the external page opens.

Related research guides

Make the method your own.

One good question changes the search.

Your next investigation
starts with one search.

Start with a public identifier. Check the network. Follow only the relationships your evidence supports.